35:30 l should clarify: Of course Deleuze has an account of order, I am just not satisfied with it :) Whitehead's primordial nature of God is not the source of potentials and does not create eternal objects, but does value them, thus granting relevant novel potentiality to finite actual occasions. The question I'd have for Deleuze is "how is relevant novelty possible?"
35:30 l should clarify: Of course Deleuze has an account of order, I am just not satisfied with it :) Whitehead's primordial nature of God is not the source of potentials and does not create eternal objects, but does value them, thus granting relevant novel potentiality to finite actual occasions. The question I'd have for Deleuze is "how is relevant novelty possible?"